The Cold War Was A Different Type Of War That The World

The Cold War was a different type of war that the world has never seen before. Instead of deploying troops, there was the threat of the deployment of nuclear bombs. This development in technology was an invisible threat which had the potential to wipe out an entire population in mere moments. If the U.S. was unable to harness the power of nuclear weapons first, then they feared that they would be annihilated and life as they knew it would forever change. The United States saw this nuclear arms race as a ticking time bomb. If it were to explode, then not only would the U.S. be wiped off from the face of the Earth, but liberty and freedom would vanish along with it. This fear would sweep across the nation to the point that the word†¦show more content†¦Ã¢â‚¬Å"The security of the United States of America was saved by sea of distances, the Allies, and by errors of a prepared enemy.† (Marshall, 211) If we were to rely on others as we did before, it could prove to be a devas tating mistake. We must be self reliant and independent, like during the Second World War. It was through aggressive and proactive acts that the U.S. had claimed victory over Japan. â€Å"The existence of the complex and fearful instruments of destruction now available make this a simple truth which is, in my opinion, undebatable.† (Marshall, 210) Because of the development of the atomic bomb, it would be a catastrophically poor decision to dismantle our greatest weapon and leave ourselves vulnerable. Instead, it should be used as a tool to ensure global peace. A similar claim would be made by President Harry S. Truman. In NSC-68: U.S. objectives and Programs for National Security, 1950, President Truman believes that in order for there to be peace, the United States must maintain its military strength. By doing so, some rights must be given up by the people for the sake of national security. â€Å"With the development of increasingly terrifying weapons of mass destruction, every individual faces the ever-present possibility of annihilation should the conflict enter the phase of total war.† (Truman, 218) Military might cannot be built by the U.S. alone. The burden must be shared among the other free countries for a defeat of free institution anywhere is aShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at the Cold War786 Words   |  3 PagesThe Cold War The Cold War was a time after World War II, so from 1945 to 1991, where the USA (United States of America) and the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) had very different views on what the new world should be like. The Cold War drew international interest for decades. Many major conflicts occurred. The conflicts consisted of the Vietnam War, the Korean War and many others. For most people though, the Cold War was about the creation and the use of weapons of mass destruction,Read MoreThe Cold War And The Soviet Union995 Words   |  4 Pages World history is an extremely important subject that all students around the world should learn about. World history is simply a branch of knowledge that welcomes all humanity. It is essential to learn because it symbolizes the question of who we are, prepares us to live in the alluring world and ensures cultural literacy. One of the most fascinating events known in history includes the Cold War. This essay will explore the fierce, overpowering, and chaotic Cold War describing itsRead MoreThe Cold War: A New History by John Lewis Gaddis831 Words   |  4 PagesAmerican history was analyzed. The Cold War is rampant with American foreign policy and influential in shaping the modern world. Strategies of Containment outlines American policy from the end of World War II until present day. Gaddis outlines the policies of presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon, including policies influenced by others such as George Kennan, John Dulles, and Henry Kissinger. The author, John Lewis Gaddis has written many books on the Cold War and is an avid researcherRead More Post-Cold War Period Causes of Conflict Essay1706 Words   |  7 PagesPost-Cold War Period Causes of Conflict The end of the Cold War meant that the ideological conflict of dominance between East (Soviet Union and Eastern Europe) and West (USA and Western Europe) was over. Contrary to the expectations that world would be much safer in the post-Cold War, United States and Soviet Union were faced with new security issues that they did not know how to deal with. The objective of this essay is to show that with all these changes thatRead MoreThe Cold War Was Inevitable Or Not?1624 Words   |  7 PagesIntroduction To gain a full understanding of the Cold War, the knowledge of the why it started, an in depth analysis of what both sides contributed to make the Cold War what was and knowing whether the Cold War was inevitable or not is necessary. There were many different actions that both of the two major superpowers, the US and the USSR took that started the Cold War. I believe that the Cold War was inevitable because of the difference in ideologies between the US and the USSR, and the largeRead MoreThe Propaganda Of The Cold War1098 Words   |  5 Pagesargument. During the Cold War the United States and Russia were both trying to win the hearts of their respective nations while fighting each other not physically of course but with tactics. To have a chance at winning one had to have the unconditional support of its people. Propaganda is an excellent way to spread a fear. This would make people turn a political ideology into an evil entity. In this deconstruction of the propaganda of the Cold War we’ll discuss the seven types of propaganda, and ofRead MoreThe War Of World War II1638 Words   |  7 PagesWorld War II was the most widespread war in history and it directly involved more than 100 million people from over 30 countries. This war lasted from 1939 to 1945. The war pinned the Axis nations which were Germany, Italy, Japan versus the Allied nations which were led by Britain and its Commonwealth nation, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States. The Allies were victorious in the War. It was one of the most significant periods of time in the 20th century. The war resultedRead MoreEssay on Impact of the Cold War on the World Economies1727 Words   |  7 PagesAbstract from Paper World War II created many issues on a world wide scale, two different forms a government were fighting for influence. This created a divide between communist countries and democratic counties which set up the Cold War. This divided world created a globalized economy unlike ever before, one with communist countries and one with democratic. All the countries of the world, of each government type, were interconnected and dependent on each other. The countries of the opposite groupRead MoreIn Elaine Taylor May’S Article, Security Against Democracy:1684 Words   |  7 PagesSecurity against Democracy: The Legacy of the Cold War at Home, written in 2011, she argued that people were willing to forgo personal freedoms for national security. She provided the example of during the nuclear age of the cold war; Americans were more interested in protection rather than concern for the common good. However, as the cold war continued and domestic issues formed, the tight knit social order that was created in the early years was falling apart. She pointed to the start of theRead MoreRivalries Exist Between Nations And The Soviet Union853 Words   |  4 Pages Rivalries exist in every aspect of the world; they highlight the differences between the philosophical, the operational and the political factors of each party. Similar to any other industries, there are always going to be rivalries; Geopolitics is no different. Rivalries exist between nations but the consequences are obviously dramatically different and far worse and no rivalry in the world could ever be compared to the one between the United States and the Soviet Union that took place in the

Do Animals Have A Say Comparative Analysis of Animal...

The subject of animal testing for human advantages has always been a debatable topic. It is still undecided whether the use of animals for human benefits is morally right. On the other hand it is scientists and researchers who think that animals are good testing subjects because of various reasons such as preventing harmful products or finding cures to diseases. The two essays â€Å"Animal Rights, Human Wrongs† by Tom Regan and â€Å"Proud to be Speciesist† by Stephen Rose talk about the concerns of animal rights but display the opposite viewpoints on the use of animals. Regans argument has a more broad concept to the matter while Rose takes a deeper dive into exacts with an opinionated personal vibe. As the authors continue writing it is obvious†¦show more content†¦Here, Regan’s ethos is displayed because he is showing who is accountable for the protection of these irreplaceable animals. He clearly provides us with information on the group of people wh o butcher these blue whales and gives us a hands-on illustration on how the butchers operate the whaling process. â€Å"But the crew has other things on their mind. It will take hours of hard work to butcher the huge carcass, a process now carried out at sea† (336). Along the way, Regan is trying to prove why humans should treat animals with respect instead of killing them by saying â€Å"the onus of justification must be borne by those who cause the harm to show that they do not violate the rights of the individuals involved† (339). Regan is trying to make the hunters prove that they are not hurting or endangering any whales and to deem their actions as justice. Regan’s credibility overshadows the narrow-minded ideas of Stephen Rose. Rose’s argument about using animals for science shows that his arguments or opinion are only based off of scientific facts and logical thoughts. Since Rose is a biology professor and a scholar himself, his point of view is valid and holds some type of worthiness or credibility. He says â€Å"The first statement is plain wrong; the second claim that animals have â€Å"rights†, is sheer can’t† (Stephen 342,343). He also mentions â€Å"speciesism† and says that activists are hypocritical and narrow-minded because they too are

Masculinity in waiting for Godot Free Essays

string(140) " the very first time, Pozzo exudes the natural sense of authority that puts all other characters on stage in a subordinate position to him\." This paper aims to explore the theme of masculinity in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. The main objective of this paper is to identify the experiences of male characters through which they try to keep their masculinity alive in Beckett’s play. It is quite clear that male characters are constantly dominant in the plot structure of the play without any female character. We will write a custom essay sample on Masculinity in waiting for Godot or any similar topic only for you Order Now Beckett has politically highlighted masculinity in his play while making the women absent and through other different traits. Although, there are many male characters but the proper hegemonic masculinity is clearly presented by only one male character, Godot. Because, we find that people are waiting for Godot to help them and the depiction of Godot’s physical appearance by boy also gives us the hint of Godot’s hegemonic masculinity. We also find male characters who are submissive. So, we can say that masculinity is a dominant theme of this play. But there are different kinds of masculinity such as hegemonic masculinity, submissive masculinity, immature masculinity and beside all this lost of masculinity is also cut and clear in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. Discussion Before starting an analysis of this topic, masculinity requires definition. According to OED, masculinity is defined as â€Å"having the quality of being masculine† and OED defines â€Å"masculine† as â€Å"having the qualities or appearance considered to be typical of men.† In the same book, the word â€Å"strong† is used for masculine and according to my point of view this word â€Å"strong† is suitable here for masculinity. Because, I want to explore masculinity in the sense of â€Å"power† as well as â€Å"strongness† in â€Å"Waiting for Godot.† All the characters of Beckett’s play are male and they are having the quality of being masculine. So, in this context we can say that there is an obvious theme of masculinity in Beckett’s â€Å"Waiting for Godot.† But when we try to analyse Beckett’s male characters from the percpective of aforementioned word â€Å"strongness† then we find confusion. Because, we can say that all his characters in â€Å"Waiting for Godot† are masculine but we cannot say that all the male characters are powerful. So, here we find â€Å"masculinity† of this play divided into two traits which are â€Å"hegemonic masculinity† and â€Å"submissive or immature masculinity.† First of all, I would like to discuss â€Å"hegemonic masculinity† in this play while analysing different characters such as Godot and Pozzo in the play, who possess hegemonic masculinity. According to R.W. Connell’s gender order theory, hegemonic masculinity is defined as practice that legitimizes men’s dominant position in society. (Connell). Godot is a hegemonic masulinity in the play though it is a fact that Godot remains abscent throughout the play but still we can say that he is a powerful male being. As we see that the two characters Vladimir and Estragon constantly wait for the arrival of Godot as he is someone who would help them to come out of their difficulities. Estragon: Let’s go. Vladimir: We cannot. Estragon: Why not? Vladimir: We are waiting for Godot. (Beckett, 66-68) These same dialogues are repeated by these two characters time and again. Their wait for Godot and the qualities of Godot gives us the hint of Godot’s hegemonic masculinity. Estragon: What do we do now? Vladimir: Wait for Godot. (Beckett, 63) And this is their routine though they know that Godot doesn’t come at the end but still they are bound to wait for him. It seems that they are unable to leave without meeting Godot. Estragon and Vladimir wait for Godot daily at a specific place but for the whole day and this thing gives us the sense to precieve Godot as an authoritative figure. Vladimir: Tied? Estragon:Ti-ed. Vladimir: How do you mean tied? Estragon:Down. Vladimir: But to whom. By whom? Estragon:To your man. Vladimir:To Godot? Tied to Godot? What an idea! No question of it. For the moment. (Beckett, 20-22) In Act 2, Beckett has given the description of Godot’s physical appearance by the boy. Godot’s physical appearance also shows his hegemonic masculinity as we are told that Godot is a character with white beard and this gives us the peculiar essence of an authoritative figure. Vladimir: Has he beard, Mr. Godot? Boy: Yes, sir. Vladimir: Fair or †¦(he hesitates)†¦ or black? Boy: I think it’s white, sir. (Beckett, 92) Although, it is a fact that Godot does not arrive in the play and many critiques argued his abscene as a lost masculinity. Jeffers in his article † Lost Masculinity in Waiting for Godot and Endgame† claimed: â€Å"Godot’s constant absence shows the impossibility of a return of the masculine authoritative tradition.† (Jeffers, 95-96) Although with this fact of Godot’s constant absence, we cannot compeletly claim that Godot is not an authoritative figure and still this is a fact that Godot is a hegemonic masculinity. We have another character who tries to show his hegemonic masculinity and to some extent he is successful in presenting himself as a powerful figure. Pozzo is the master of Lucky, he is a landowner and the way he treats his slave shows his power. In this play, it is Pozzo who has things to eat and in the very first act he ate chicken and then threw its bone. When Estragon asked him to have that bone just to lick, Pozzo says that Estragon should ask it to Lucky because it is Lucky’s right to have the bones of Pozzo. He is trying to impose himself as God and Pozzo tries to show his superiority in different ways, when lucky refused to have bones, he says: Pozzo: I don’t like it. I’ve never known him refuse a bone before. (Beckett, 27) While talking with Estragon and Vladimir, Pozzo talks about his superiority and according to him he is â€Å"made in God’s image†(23). At one place, Pozzo asked them if they want money from him. So, all these traits present him as a hegemonic masculinity or an authoritative figure, he shows a natural sense of authority and he considers everybody his subordinates. † As he comes on stage for the very first time, Pozzo exudes the natural sense of authority that puts all other characters on stage in a subordinate position to him. You read "Masculinity in waiting for Godot" in category "Papers"† (Wright, 18) But as the play moves on, we see Pozzo as a â€Å"blind† character in act 2. With this sudden blindness, he has the sense of authority as we see that even after his blindness he mal-treats Lucky as well as his language with Lucky. Pozzo’s sudden blindness also gives us the hint of his immature masculinity. † Though emulating a Godot-like authority, Pozzo’s masculinity ultimately fails to maintain a consistent hegemonic status because of the matrix of power that forces all within it beneath Godot in a hierarchy.† (Wright, 1-24) We cannot totally disagree with this statement because what Wright has said is truth. Although, Godot and Pozzo are shown as powerful figure but the unstable power of Godot appears with his constant absence and Pozzo’s sudden blindness. I am not completely agreed with the aforementioned statement because even with their defects still they have the aura of authoritative figures which remain throughout the play. As in this part I am discussing hegemonic masculinity in Beckett’s â€Å"Waiting for Godot.† So, I would also like to analyse Vladimir and Estragon’s character in this context. It is clear that the other characters do not share the sense of proper hegemonic masculinity but still at some places we observe that Estragon and Vladimir control eachother just to get the sense of hegemonic masculinity. Vladimir is a male figure who tries to consolidate his hegemonic masculinity while controling Estragon whereas Estragon can only show his power over the boy. This mutual dependency and to control eachother is just to get the sense of hegemony which gives us to the sense of immature masculinity of the characters. As there is hegemonic masculinity in the play so we also find dominant theme of immature masculinity through different characters in this play. According to Oxford Dictionary dictionary, the word â€Å"immature† suggests â€Å"to behave in a way that is not sensible and is typical of people who are much younger†(Pg 761). Estragon and Vladimir’s characters are best examples of this immature masculinity. Their constant wait for saviour in the shape of Godot shows their immature masculinity. Both these characters wait for Godot without any given reason and they do not give up even with Godot’s constant absence from the stage. Their inaction and inability to do anything put a stuff to the immature masculinity that they are male or masculine and he is considered the symbol of power but these two characters are powerless and inactive. Vladimir: We are waiting for Godot. Estragon:Ah! what’ll we do, what’ll we do! Vladimir: There is nothing we can do. (Beckett, 68) They themselves are unable to do anything but they are in vain hope to get help from Godot. Side by side this vain hope for saviour, they are mutually dependent on eachother and they could leave or live alone. Even, these characters themselves do not know why don’t they live without eachother. It is their weird attitude which makes them insensible. In the first act, Vladimir says Estragon that he could not defend himself that’s why he does not live away from him. Estragon: You see, you feel worse when i’m with you. I feel better alone, too. Vladimir :Then why do you always come crawling back? Estragon: I do not know. According to Wright in his article â€Å"Gender and Power in Waiting for Godot†: â€Å"Each character is unable to maintain a dominant power-position, masculinity throughout this play is atrophied and impotent— and thus each character’s position within a larger framework of gender and power is consistently unstable.† (Ryan Wright,1-24) To some extent, he is quite right in his statement because the unstable and immature masculinity of some characters is quite clear. Estragon and Vladimir have submissive masculinity with insensibility. One of the critic argued: † As two main characters like Vladimir and Estragon useful purpose in their lives and their conversation to each other is purposeless and their conversation have no positive meaning.† (Bari, Mansoor, Alia, 312-315) Estragon is a male figure who is more submissive than that of Vladimir because it is Estragon who picks up the chicken ones to lick which are thrown by Pozzo and he is even ready to take money from pozzo. Whereas, Vladimir is also submissive as we see that he submits his masculinity infront of Godot’s character and remains inactive throughout the play. Their weird attitudes and absurd discussion show their immaturity in the play. Even the boy who was sent by Godot was also submissive in front of Estragon and Vladimir. Lucky is also a clear example of submissive character. When Estragon asked about Lucky’s not putting the bag down, Pozzo said: † Has he not the right to? Certainly he has. It follows that he doesn’t want to. There is reasoning for you.† (Beckett, 31) The element of homosexuality in the play also throws an ample light on the submissiveness of characters. We can precieve Vladimir as a male character while on the other hand Estragon as an effiminate character. Their relationship seems to be the relationship of husband, wife. Both these characters are almost submissive and dependent on eacother. Immature masculinity at once becomes very clear when both Estragon and Vladimir start playing like children. At one place, Vladimir suggests Estragon to mimic Pozzo and Lucky and all these habits are quite childish of younger persons. The sudden defects of characters show the immaturity of male figures, as Pozzo was blind in second act and Lucky was dumb without any provided reason. The absurd way both the characters talk to eachother as well as we observe throughout the play that Estragon and Vladimir are in the habbit of forgetting things. This habit is more clear in Estragon’s character, the uncertainity and delibrate forgetfullness. It seems that Estragon himself doesn’t want to remember things as Estragon says time and again † I don’t Know†(66). There is some sort of paradox in this play as well. Man who is considered to be a powerful and strong figure, here we see him as a fearful, afraid and coward being. Both Estragon and Vladimir could not live alone without eachother. They are so afraid of living alone that they could not live even they want to. Neither of them actually wishing to be apart from eachother. They are men but they are behaving like little chickenhearted children. Even there are dialogues which give us hint that they try to drift apart but they are actually unable to do so. Vladimir :I am glad to see you back. I thought you were gone forever. Estragon :Me too. (Beckett) Masculinity is also present in the shape of violence and this is the isolation that whenever one tries to go near somebody else, he is violently treated by the other. And this thing is quite clear where Lucky hits Estragon. When Estragon goes near Lucky, it is Lucky who violently push him away. † Here Estragon approaches Lucky and makes to wipe his eyes. Lucky kicks him violently in the shins. Estragon drops the handkerchief, recoils, staggers about the stage howling with pain.† (Beckett) We can associate this submissive masculinity with the life of Beckett. Beckett was an Anglo-Irish and the people had to submit their masculinity infront of the British. Jennifer M. Jeffers wrote in â€Å"Traumatized Masculinity and Beckett’s Return† that: â€Å"The Ireland that Beckett knew as a boy had vanished and the only return possible was through his writing.† (Jeffers, 10) In this play, Beckett’s main male characters are submissive and inactive and the reason behind this is the history which Beckett has tried to present in his play. As the masculine figures of Ireland had to submit their masculinity in the hands of the British. And it was the lost masculinity in Ireland, Beckett who was an Anglo-Irish, presented this hegemonic masculinity, lost masculinity and submissive masculinity in his play â€Å"Waiting for Godot.† â€Å"My argument from chapter to chapter is that Beckett texts are grounded in his personal experience of what was literally erased from â€Å"official† historical record.† (Jeffers, 1-10) Through these arguments it is clear that Beckett has presented different types of masculinity in this play while presenting six male characters without any female character.Many feminist critiques argued that there is politics of beckett behind not presenting female characters. Masculinity is so strong in his play that he even didn’t use the word of woman or female for a single time. Conclusion So, we can say that masculinity is the dominant theme of this play with only male characters. Thus, the aforementioned arguments clearly show us that masculinity is present but in different traits as hegemonic masculinity, submissive masculinity, immature masulinity, lost of masculinity as well as homosexuality in masculinity and all these types of masculinities are shown by six male characters who are in relationship with eachother in different ways. It can be also said that Beckett had tried to present history of Anglo-Irish males who were dominated by the British during colonization. † Beckett’s waiting for Godot stage Western masculinity in order to enact the failure of Western patriarchy.† (Jeffers,9). Work Citation Beckett, Samuel. (1956). Waiting for Godot. faber and faber limited. Pp: 9-94. Jeffers, Jennifer M. (2009). â€Å"Traumatized Masculinity and Beckett’s Return.† Beckett’s Masculinity. St. Martin’s Press LLC, New York. Pp: 9-37. Wright, Ryan. (2016). â€Å"Gender and Power in Waiting for Godot.† The Oswald Review: An International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Criticism in the Discipline of English. vol. 18: iss. 1, Article. 3. Pp: 5-28. Khan, Abdul Bari, Hafiza Sana Mansoor,; Huma Alia. (2015). â€Å"The Impact of Absurdism in Waiting for Godot.† International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education. vol. 1, iss 2. Pp: 312-315. Jeffers, Jennifer M. (2009). â€Å"Embodying Lost Masculinity in Waiting for Godot.† Beckett’s Masculinity. St. Martin’s Press LLC, New York. Pp: 95-118. Hancock, Mark, Michael Ashby. (2015). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University Press. ed. 9. Pp: 1-930. Beckett, Samuel. (1982). Waiting for Godot. Grove Press, New York. print. How to cite Masculinity in waiting for Godot, Papers

Renewable energy Essay Example For Students

Renewable energy Essay Fuel Cell: Fuel cells have been known to science for 150 years and have become the subject of intense research since World War II. A fuel cell generates electricity by producing a chemical reaction. It consists of two electrodes (cathode and anode), which is also where the reaction occurs. Hydrogen is the basic fuel cell, but all fuel cells also require oxygen, and both are supplied from external reservoirs. Most of the hydrogen and oxygen used, combine to form a harmless byproduct, namely water. Therefore, fuel cells generate electricity with very little pollution. It is the purpose of the fuel cells to produce an electrical current that can be directed outside the cell to do work, such as powering light bulbs or an electric motor. There are five different fuel cells, solid oxide, alkali, proton exchange membrane (40-50% efficiency), phosphoric acid, and molten carbonate. Biomass Energy: This is one of the oldest sources of energy known to man.Biomass energy is energy from organic matter. The organic matter contains stored sunlight in the form of chemical energy. Biomass fuel, which can be a liquid, solid, or gas, comes from plants, residues from agriculture or forestry, and the organic component of municipal and industrial wastes. Even the fumes from the landfills can be used. When the fuel is burned, the energy is released. The use of this energy has potential to greatly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The waste generates about the same amount of carbon dioxide as fossil fuels but as the plants grow (for biomass purposes), carbon dioxide will be removed from the atmosphere. This is the major source of energy in the developing world. Wind Energy: Surface air currents that are warmed by solar rays create wind, which is an indirect source of energy. Wind farms consist of many wind turbines, that when moved by the wind, produce electricity for utilities. The turbines sit high atop towers to take advantage of the stronger less turbulent winds. Wind turbines can stand alone, or be connected to a utility power grid, or combined with a PV system. The energy is used for generating electricity, charging batteries, pumping water, or grinding grain. There are no air pollutants or greenhouse gasses emitted. Wind energy is also a competitive resource. Words/ Pages : 399 / 24