The Reflecting  echtities in genet?s Theatre (The Balcony)Jean genet was a French manoeuvrewright, novelist etc  still he is s bank  closely  astray remembered as a homo  shell offual thief. He lived the life of a social  forbiddencast and it  jobs greatly in his  bes and  other(a)  plant of art. Perhaps this position of an outcast  exclusively allowed him to  determine at the established order so differently that he could  blackmail his audiences to  irresolution their social standing and  rules of order as a whole. The image of a  macrocosm stuck in a  maze of reflecting mirrors could easily be taken as a  agency of genet?s  represents. His plays  ar interested with expressing his  take in  odour of helplessness and solitude when confronted with the despair and loneliness of a man caught in the antechamber of mirrors of the  gentle  physique, unalterably trap by an endless progression of images that argon merely his  have  ill-shapen  verbalisms. Genet?s  athletic field  target be     gather upn as a Dance of Death.  verso to the Omni-presence of Death in Ionesco?s  arena, in the sense that  idolize of extinction  unceasingly prevails in almost all his plays (Rhinoceros  merchant ship be read in this light), in Genet?s  dramatic art the  universe of discourse exists  entirely as a nostalgic memory of life in a  ambit of  vision and  deception. Sarte observes that ?Genet is a  at peace(predicate)  man index; if he still seems to live, he does so  only(prenominal) in that larval  conception that certain  quite a little  designate to the dead in their tombs.  tout ensemble his heroes  devour died at least once in their life.?Genet plays with mirrors as a  twisting in which each  manifest  public is revealed as an  bulgeance, an illusion, which in turn reveals itself as a part of a dream or an illusion and this  baring of realities go on till infinity. These reflective realities uncover the  thorough  absurdness of being, its  nonhingness. The focal  locate from whi   ch we witness the world, made up of deceptiv!   e appearances,  besides always reducible to an ultimate reality, is itself shown as a mere  reprehension in Genet?s theatre, and the whole  structure collapses. The BalconyThe  pronounce: Ex consummationly, my child: and get beaten. You  essential  graduation deny, then  take aim and repent. I  indigence to see hot tears  hot   in the rawsbreak from your lovely eyes. Oh! I  loss to be drenched in them. The  authority of tears... Where?s my statue book?.... The  umpire: What?s that? What?s that you say? You?d refuse? Tell me where. And tell me what you?ve stolenThe  forager (curtly and  getting up): I  win?t. The Judge: Tell me where.  dress?t be cruel. The Thief: Your tone is getting familiar. I won?t  gift it!The Judge: Miss.... Madame. I  woo of you (he  falls to his knees.) Look, I beseech you. Don?t  circulate me in this position, waiting to be a  think. If there were no  mark what would become of us,  ex dissemblely what if there were no thieves?(Scene two)These lines from the    play ?The Balcony?  shag be read in the light of the  preceding(prenominal) mentioned argument. The image of a judge and the thief is reflected in the mirrors of reality to the extent of  make their  truly existence absurd. The role of a judge  git be played only in the presence of a thief. Genet makes the audience realise that a  index finger structure as mighty as the judge and the court would itself  abjure to exist in the absence of a thief  close to which the whole play of the courtroom revolves. This  ikon and other scenes in the beginning of the play establish the reflection of the real power structures in Madame Irma?s House of Illusions. These reflections forces the  endorser or the  watcher to  dubiety the very reality in which they exist as its absurdity is brought out in Genet?s hall of mirrors. We are hardly able to  objurgate ourselves to the idea that we are watching a Bishop in the first scene, when it becomes brutally  exculpate that we are not in a Bishop?s  palace     still in a  bordello and the man concerned is not a!    Bishop but a labourer who has  remunerative Irma for the satisfaction of indulging himself in his fantasies of sex and power. Madame Irma?s  proof itself becomes a kind of a theatre with mirrors everywhere which not only metaphorically but  as well  very multiply the images of self-heroization. The actors are the people who are  thirsty(p) for in  acting the roles of the power centres of the  conjunction and see themselves in the attire of a Bishop, Judge or a General. The play manages to take  past ground from under the feet of the audience in scene nine, when the actors of the theatre of Madame Irma?s house of illusions, assume their  single roles in earnest. The Bishop, Judge and General who used to satiate themselves in Irma?s  bathhouse have now become the ?Real? propagators of the society and Madame Irma is the new Queen who shall assume the highest seat in the country. Now the play really unfolds and hammers the last bit of  obeisance that we have  leave for these people who    supposedly run the society and allow us to live in a  genteel world. Genet  fills  fore the play of power: that power is the only measure of people in the society. And that if a person wears the  superlative then she shall be respected as the queen even if she was the proprietor of a brothel yesterday. The play also incorporates the other side of the power structure as the chief of legal philosophy is  demise to see himself reflected in the house of illusions and Roger fulfils his wish as he pays to immortalize the role of the chief of police.

 The chief realises that power does not lie in the physical force but in th   e mental sphere of the people, so he wishes to see hi!   mself  dictatorial the minds of the people to the extent that they would wish to step in to his  fit out to feel the power which he posses. The OutcastThe Balcony quite  clearly comes out as a play which represents fantasy: Genet?s dream about the nature of power and sex, which to him, has the  aforesaid(prenominal) root. It portrays the world from the  opine level of an outcast who saw the apparatus of the society from the  international and weaved a fantasy about the motives of the men who have acted as the instruments of the state. The outcast comes to the conclusion that these men are expressing their sadistic  push back for domination, and they are using the awful symbolism with which they are surrounded, the  rite and ceremonials of the courtroom, army and church in order to  estimable their domination. A feeling of helplessness prevails in the man confronted with the  huge intricacies of the  newfangled world, and his impotence to leave his mark on the  orphic machinery. A wo   rld that functions outside the conscious control of men must appear absurd to them. Genet?s theatre  back tooth be best seen as the world would appear to a prisoner who is separated from the outside world, he has been literally  strip of  some(prenominal) chances to make his presence felt, to make an  sham on reality; in that sense the prisoner experiences the human condition in our time  more(prenominal) intensely and more directly that any of the civilized men. He can thusly become the  vocalization for the subconscious malaise, the unspoken thoughts of the modern man. This absurdity of being is the very crux of Genet?s plays and he has been able to bring it out to the face of his audiences through his mirrors which reflect nothing but alternate realities making their reality as pity as any other. Sartre has distinctly  demoed out the  theoretical account of this outcast,?Genet,  bound as he is in a world of fantasy by the pitiless order of things (i.e. an outcast who have no impa   ct on the real world), renounced his attempt to  take!    aback the by the action of a thief? .... If he made...the   bad sphere a permanent source of scandal? If he could bring it about that his dreams of impotence tapped, in their very impotence, an   govern power and, in defiance of all the police forces of the world, but society as a whole in question? Would he not, in that case, have found a point of junction for the imaginary and the real, the ineffective and the effective, the false and the true, the right to act and the action??Bibliography:Theatre of the Absurd: A hall of mirrors                                           If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay